4 Jan
2008
The Role of Computers in Private Investigation
Today, more and more cases involve the use of stored data in a suspect’s computer as evidence.
In the town of Delavan, the computer of town clerk Dixie Bersteen had been given to a private investigator to search for possible clues. Last August 27, 2007, Bersteen had filed a formal complaint with the police department because she believed that her computer had been tampered. When the Janesville Gazette requested for information about the complaint, the Police Chief at that time, Andrew Mayer, had refused to give any.
He has been fired since then and temporarily replaced by Deputy Chief Phillip Smith as interim chief.
The computer was, however, seized by town attorney Steve Wassel with Town Supervisors Kay Franzen and Jim Wolfgram acting as witnesses. But because neither the Walworth County District Attorney’s Office nor the state Attoney General’s Office wanted to take possession of the computer, it was turned over instead to a private investigator.
In Suffolk, Long Island, another computer was confiscated for containing evidence against the suspect. James Bonfiglio, a Ronkonkoma karate teacher and proprietor of Excel Karate Academy, was arrested after one of his students reported to his mother and the police about having sex with his karate teacher.
An investigation then ensued with the police searching for vital clues in the academy and the suspect’s home, both of which were places where the said incidents had allegedly occurred. The police had been able to uncover two hidden cameras in the suspect’s home and another one in the academy’s bathroom. Investigators also confiscated the suspect’s computer, having seen stored instant messages and emails which hinted about Bonfiglio’s possibly similar involvement with ten other students, all of them underaged. At least two other male adults had surfaced and informed the police about having sexual relations with Bonfiglio when they were young students of the suspect themselves. Neither, however, had pressed charges.
In New Orleans, Forensic Analysis and Engineering Corp. had requested for the federal judge to prevent a lawyer from conforming to a subpoena for a computer hard drive owned by one of the company’s employees. Lawyer Zach Scruggs represents hundreds of New Orleans homeowners suing insurance companies for overbilling damages brought upon by Hurricane Katrina. The computer drive is believed to contain sensitive information that could prove such claims, by the company is concerned about public dissemination of “privileged information” which may be stored in the hard drive.
These three are just a few cases in which data stored in computers has proved to be critical in solving mysteries. Thus, private investigations are sure to include searching for possible clues inside computers, too. Remember this when you’re hiring a private investigator – or someone else has hired one to investigate you.
RSS
RSS